the challenge for energy developers is to reduce
the capital cost of renewable technologies and
improve the energy conversion processes.
TABlE 2. SToraGE MECHaNISMS aNd PoSSIBlE aPPlICaTIoNS
Storage Energy discharge Potential
Technology Category Time application
Batteries and Power Quality,
Flow Battery Distributed Gen
Reversible Distributed Gen
Fuel Cell
Superconducting Electromagnetic Electromagnetic Seconds/ PowerQuality
Magnetic Energy Field Minutes
Storage (SMES)
Fly wheels Power Quality
are suitable for storing large amounts
of electricity, and their capacity may
be limited only by the size of the storage space (cavern or reservoir) that is
geographically available.
Thermal energy is stored as a form
of internal energy that includes both
sensible (associated with a change of
temperature) and latent (associated
with a change of phase) heat. It is generally easy and inexpensive to store,
but it does not convert directly to
electricity as with the electrochemical
or electromagnetic methods. Instead,
TES relies on thermal electric generation to convert the thermal energy
back to electricity. Unlike other electric storage devices, the downstream
conversion of electricity to thermal
energy can be 100 percent by Joule
heating (whereby passage of current through an
electrical resistance releases heat). However, the
conversion of thermal energy back to electricity
is limited by the thermal energy quality (which
depends on temperature) and the associated
power conversion efficiency. Therefore, one key
to enabling thermal energy for electricity generation is to improve the thermal cycle efficiency.
Based on efficiency improvements over the past
century, there are several prospects for achieving
high-efficiency TES that promise reliable and
relatively low-cost electricity.
Stored
Electron/Ion
Charge
Hydrogen
Electrochemical Hours
Chemical Days
Compressed-Air
Energy Storage
(CAES)
Pumped Hydro
Storage (PHS)
Thermal Energy
Storage ( TES)
Mechanical
Inertia
Compressed
Energy
Mechanical
Mechanical
Minutes/
Hours
Days
expected life of 30 to 40 years, which is more
than three times longer than the lifetime of electrochemical methods, resulting in long-term
benefits and lower life-cycle cost.
Figure 3 (facing page), shows storage performance in terms of roundtrip efficiency
for typical storage technologies. Energy storage efficiency is a metric that
accounts for the net electricity delivered from the storage system relative
to the amount of electricity put into
the storage system. Electric storage
efficiency often excludes electricity
generation and transmission efficien-cies from the original power sources.
From the metrics of power rating and
storage capacity in figure 2, utility-scale
energy storage favors PHS, CAES and
TES. This article will focus on comparing the performance of those three
storage methods in renewable applications. PHS is a well-known, highly
efficient, long-term and large-scale
energy storage method. PHS stores
potential energy in the form of water,
pumped from a lower-elevation reservoir to a higher-elevation reservoir,
The efficiency of CAES and PHS storage
methods can be affected by the geological configuration and method of operation. In a conventional CAES arrangement, the air in a cavern or container is heated during compression
Bulk Energy
Storage
Water Potential
Energy
Internal Energy
Mechanical
Months
Thermal
Hours/
Days
Bulk Energy
Storage
Bulk Energy
Storage
quadrant — batteries, electrochemical capacitors, flywheels and SMES — serve short-term
electricity storage needs for power quality and
distributed generation. For long-term bulk energy storage and stationary generation, CAES and
PHS are broadly accepted. TES can achieve the
same power rating and storage capacity as CAES
and PHS by expanding the plant size as needed.
The power rating of existing and planned CSP
plants ranges from 50 to 300 MWe. Similar to
CAES and PHS, CSP plants with TES have an
InCREASE In EnERGY ABunDAnCE
24 May 2012 SOLAR TODAY solartoday.org
comparison of the storage
technologies and tes as
a Means for electric energy storage
In selecting storage technologies one must
consider each storage capability at its power
rating, storage capacity, performance in terms
of total roundtrip efficiency, lifetime, reliability, ease of installation and cost. Power rating
and storage capacity determine the scale of the
storage application. The other factors affect economic benefits.
Figure 2 (facing page), illustrates storage technologies on power rating and capacity scales. The technologies in the lower-left
Solar radiation
incident on Earth,
120,000 TW
Wind,
870 TW
Geothermal,
32 TW
Global total
energy
consumption,
15 TW
Hydropower,
7. 2 TW
InCREASE In ElECTRICITY DISPATCHABIlITY
Copyright © 2012 by the American Solar Energy Society Inc. All rights reserved.