s 25 y
clean energy revolution as “the moral equivalent
of war” and set out the urgency of action against
climate change.
“Clinton had just been elected,” Hayes
recalled. “He and Al Gore divided up their policy responsibilities, and Gore was going to cover
environmental and energy issues. So we allowed
ourselves a couple of months of robust optimism. Then Clinton was sworn in as president
and placed all his bets on health care reform, and
Hayes continued from page 18
“I believe that humanity is three
to five years away from having
solar power available more
cheaply than coal.”
Denis Hayes
everything else went by the wayside. Clinton was
the most skillful politician of our generation and
I regard those eight years as largely wasted. I did
get good response to the article, but not from the
White House. Mostly it came from friends in the
[nongovernmental organization] community.”
Hayes is optimistic again. “The next 25 years
in solar will be strong,” he predicted. “As a planet, we’re now moving the way we would have if
we’d gotten Carter re-elected. The tragedy is that
the United States dropped the torch. The flame
was kept alive by Japan and then Germany with
their feed-in tariffs. A dozen other countries now
have worked to achieve the volume we needed to
drive us down the cost curves. The basic technology of what we do now was all within our grasp
in the Carter years.
“Five years ago the Chinese were barely on
the horizon, but now that the Chinese government has made the investment to distribute
solar throughout the world, China will this year
make 60 percent of the world’s solar modules.
It’s appalling to me that the United States is
not leading the industry, when the dominant
technologies were developed here, and with taxpayer dollars. Given the political climate in the
United States, it’s hard to see how we can regain
the manufacturing lead. Our best shot now is
a new generation of technologies to produce
superefficient nanowire cells, multiple-junction
cells, that sort of thing.
“I believe that humanity is three to five years
away from having solar power available more
cheaply than coal, even without carbon capture.
We’re edging toward an era where the consequences of carbon emissions are so dire that
we will have to stop burning coal. I’m guessing
that the answer to global warming will be solar
technologies around the world and in the United
States. We can make that transition very rapidly,
except for aviation. And we can get by with less
aviation. High-speed electrified rail is now making leaps and bounds in every industrial society
except North America.” —SETH MaSIa
“I quickly became convinced
that the skeptic arguments were
very weak, and that the science
was very strong.”
Chuck Kutscher
20 January/February 2012 SOLAR TODA Y solartoday.org
Copyright © 2012 by the American Solar Energy Society Inc. All rights reserved.